python - Difference in behavior between basic type (int) and complex type (np.ndarray) -


why following objects behaving differently regard [x] * n operation? i.e. why first operation (in[94]) modify single entry of list, whereas second operation (in[99]) modify all entries?

in [91]: x = 8  in [92]: y = [x] * 10  in [93]: y out[93]: [8, 8, 8, 8, 8, 8, 8, 8, 8, 8]  in [94]: y[1] = 4  in [95]: y out[95]: [8, 4, 8, 8, 8, 8, 8, 8, 8, 8]  in [96]: x = np.zeros(shape=(3,3))  in [97]: y = [x] * 10  in [98]: y out[98]:  [array([[ 0.,  0.,  0.],         [ 0.,  0.,  0.],         [ 0.,  0.,  0.]]), array([[ 0.,  0.,  0.],         [ 0.,  0.,  0.],         [ 0.,  0.,  0.]]), array([[ 0.,  0.,  0.],         [ 0.,  0.,  0.],         [ 0.,  0.,  0.]]), array([[ 0.,  0.,  0.],         [ 0.,  0.,  0.],         [ 0.,  0.,  0.]]), array([[ 0.,  0.,  0.],         [ 0.,  0.,  0.],         [ 0.,  0.,  0.]]), array([[ 0.,  0.,  0.],         [ 0.,  0.,  0.],         [ 0.,  0.,  0.]]), array([[ 0.,  0.,  0.],         [ 0.,  0.,  0.],         [ 0.,  0.,  0.]]), array([[ 0.,  0.,  0.],         [ 0.,  0.,  0.],         [ 0.,  0.,  0.]]), array([[ 0.,  0.,  0.],         [ 0.,  0.,  0.],         [ 0.,  0.,  0.]]), array([[ 0.,  0.,  0.],         [ 0.,  0.,  0.],         [ 0.,  0.,  0.]])]  in [99]: y[1][1,2] = 5  in [100]: y out[100]:  [array([[ 0.,  0.,  0.],         [ 0.,  0.,  5.],         [ 0.,  0.,  0.]]), array([[ 0.,  0.,  0.],         [ 0.,  0.,  5.],         [ 0.,  0.,  0.]]), array([[ 0.,  0.,  0.],         [ 0.,  0.,  5.],         [ 0.,  0.,  0.]]), array([[ 0.,  0.,  0.],         [ 0.,  0.,  5.],         [ 0.,  0.,  0.]]), array([[ 0.,  0.,  0.],         [ 0.,  0.,  5.],         [ 0.,  0.,  0.]]), array([[ 0.,  0.,  0.],         [ 0.,  0.,  5.],         [ 0.,  0.,  0.]]), array([[ 0.,  0.,  0.],         [ 0.,  0.,  5.],         [ 0.,  0.,  0.]]), array([[ 0.,  0.,  0.],         [ 0.,  0.,  5.],         [ 0.,  0.,  0.]]), array([[ 0.,  0.,  0.],         [ 0.,  0.,  5.],         [ 0.,  0.,  0.]]), array([[ 0.,  0.,  0.],         [ 0.,  0.,  5.],         [ 0.,  0.,  0.]])]

tl;dr : implicitly made shallow copy of matrix when expecting deep copy. documentation

consider following bit of code:

in [38]: import numpy  in [39]: = numpy.eye(2)  in [40]: out[40]: array([[ 1.,  0.],        [ 0.,  1.]])  in [41]: b =  in [42]: b out[42]: array([[ 1.,  0.],        [ 0.,  1.]])  in [43]: a[0,0] = 2  in [44]: out[44]: array([[ 2.,  0.],        [ 0.,  1.]])  in [45]: b out[45]: array([[ 2.,  0.],        [ 0.,  1.]])

also: 

in [46]: id(a) out[46]: 140529107552512  in [47]: id(b) out[47]: 140529107552512

i defined a. set b=a , changed a find same change in b though didn't touch b.

by line [x] * 10, made 10 shallow copies of x. so, change in 1 reflects on others. 

in [90]: x = np.zeros(shape=(3,3)) in [95]: y = [x] * 10  in [96]: id(y[0]) out[96]: 140529110575952  in [97]: id(y[1]) out[97]: 140529110575952  in [98]: y[1][1,2] = 5  in [99]: id(y[0]) out[99]: 140529110575952  in [100]: id(y[1]) out[100]: 140529110575952

this not problem int or any other non-compound type.

in [105]: x = 0  in [106]: y = [x] * 10  in [107]: y out[107]: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]  in [108]: y[1] = 2  in [109]: y out[109]: [0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]  in [110]: id(y[0]) out[110]: 140529069263200  in [111]: id(y[1]) out[111]: 140529069263152

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c++ - Difference between pre and post decrement in recursive function argument -

i have following sample code used pre-decrement void function(int c) { if(c == 0) { return; } else { cout << "dp" << c << endl; function(--c); cout << c << endl; return; } } this function give output input 4 : dp3 dp2 dp1 dp0 0 1 2 3 but when use post decrement void function(int c) { if(c == 0) { return; } else { cout << "dp" << c << endl; function(c--); cout << c << endl; return; } } output goes in infinite loop dp4 can explain me in detail why happens ? this happens because function(c--) called same value of c , when finishes c decremented. recursively called, hence called same value no chance of return , hit stack overflow error. assume this, int x = 1, y = 0; y = x++ result y == 1 , x == 2. if y = ++x , bot x , y 2.
Read more

c# - Retrieve google contact -

i'm using .net retrieve contact info google contact. however, retrieves including sent email not stored in contact. there anyway can retrieve contact contact? here code requestsettings rs = new requestsettings("", email, password); rs.autopaging = true; contactsrequest cr = new contactsrequest(rs); feed<contact> contacts = cr.getcontacts(); foreach (contact contact in contacts.entries) { name name = contact.name; response.write(name.givenname + " " + name.familyname + "<br/>"); foreach (email emailid in contact.emails) { response.write(emailid.address + "<br/>"); } response.write("<br/>"); } im using google.gdata.contacts package nuget v 2.2.0 string redirecturi = "urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob"; // build base oauth2 parameters var oauth2
Read more

javascript - How to insert selected radio button value into table cell -

i have 5 radio buttons <input type="radio" id="rating">1 <input type="radio" id="rating2">2 <input type="radio" id="rating3">3 <input type="radio" id="rating4">4 <input type="radio" id="rating5">5 i have 1 table <table id="mytabledata" border="1" style="width:100%"> <tr id="templaterow"> <th>ratings</th> </tr> </table> one add button <input type="button" id="add" value="add" onclick="addradiovalue()"> i've written code dynamically add rows table, when select radio button , click on add button, value of selected radio button should inserted new cell within table ratings. i able thing text box, i'm not able radio button. can me? your problems didn't have name set on radios , tryi
Read more