assembly - Hidden value included when putting ebx register into a DD variable -


at 1 moment while executing code turbo debugger, bx register has 0001 value in it.

(i can view bx register in turbo debugger, , not find how view whole ebx. side question: how view whole eax/ebx/... registers? )

immediately after, when send ebx dd variable sum1, sent value becomes 30310001h.

what reasons , how can avoid it?

my guess reason: sum1 recieved invisible value, included in ebx not bx (contained ebx).

(i new ebx/eax/... registers btw.)

if guessed right, how can access unseen part of ebx?

this shortened code, loop2a converts string decimal value, char-by-char, , puts ebx.

loop2a:     mov     eax, [di]     mov     ah, 0     sub     eax, '0'      imul    eax, ecx     add     ebx, eax     mov     sum1, ebx      imul    ecx, ten            dec     di      cmp     di,     jne     loop2a      mov     sum1, ebx

(compiler: turbo assembler, processor: intel x86.)

anywhere in code initialized bx (xor bx,bx or mov bx,0). change ebx (xor ebx,ebx or mov ebx,0). cannot separately access upper word of 32-bit-register.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Email notification in google apps script -

https://support.google.com/docs/answer/91588?hl=en i have sheet the cells filled in data pulled via apps script, website. pull in exact same data, not. on old sheets version use able emails when data "changes" different value. new sheets, email when new data pasted cells, though exact same data......and, can't set @ ranges anymore, entire document. there easy way watch cells when data changes, , email myself? this looks lot you're trying do. for checking whether value has changed after edit, this gives necessary information it. hence, know whether new value same 1 or not. implementing "workaround" talked in second link, able compare , send email myself if value changed. initiate onedit trigger goes off onedit function uses these lines after checks in place have passed. var email = "xyz@whatever.com"; mailapp.sendemail(email, "triggermail", "a change has occurred in sheet"); note: sends "notification...
Read more

c++ - Difference between pre and post decrement in recursive function argument -

i have following sample code used pre-decrement void function(int c) { if(c == 0) { return; } else { cout << "dp" << c << endl; function(--c); cout << c << endl; return; } } this function give output input 4 : dp3 dp2 dp1 dp0 0 1 2 3 but when use post decrement void function(int c) { if(c == 0) { return; } else { cout << "dp" << c << endl; function(c--); cout << c << endl; return; } } output goes in infinite loop dp4 can explain me in detail why happens ? this happens because function(c--) called same value of c , when finishes c decremented. recursively called, hence called same value no chance of return , hit stack overflow error. assume this, int x = 1, y = 0; y = x++ result y == 1 , x == 2. if y = ++x , bot x , y 2.
Read more

javascript - IE11 incompatibility with jQuery's 'readonly'? -

the code i'm running has no issues in firefox, or chrome. user typing 1 textbox, tabs next , can continue typing that. when run webpage on ie11, user tabs next textbox , can't type in. textbox has double-clicked before user can insert anything. i've googled , seems ie give problems when using older jquery (i.e. prefers 'prop' 'attr' ). in code below jquery's readonly keyword being used in way ie11 no longer recognise/accept? i assume issue readonly , removeclass('ignore') working expected. //when focus on textbox 1 $("#field1").focus(function() { //remove readonly property textbox 1 $('#field1').prop('readonly', false).removeclass('ignore'); //add readonly property other textboxes $('#field2, #field3, #field4') .prop('readonly', 'readonly').addclass('ignore').val(''); }); i'm using jquery 2.1.3 ...
Read more